Section 2 302 // App Definition of Evidence Moto was not proved because no evidence was presented as to why no eyewitness was mentioned in the FIR, hence the prosecution No statement can be made on the witness's statement, since his name was as a witness. The FIR was not mentioned by the complainant, who was listed with a delay of two days without any comprehensible explanation, even the presence of witnesses or the presence of other children was also mentioned in the FIR. Was not made or shown in any action by the investigating officer. The location of the incident after the case was registered cannot be based on the sole testimony of a child witness if the police did not record the witnesses' statements, immediately and due to the delay in recording, then reasonable explanation. Was needed. The explanation offered by the prosecution for such delay, presented by the prosecution for such delay, did not encourage the trust that the accused, allegedly used during the rope, was not seized on the identification of the accused. The statements of the accused before the prosecution's witnesses could not be termed as extra-judicial confession because there was no time, date and method regarding the crime, the crime, the crime, the commission, Germany. Was not specified. The prosecution's witnesses confessed to the accused after their confession, they also indicated that a piece of evidence was nowhere available, except for their imagination, the prosecution for connecting the accused to the death. Has no evidence
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
