The plaintiff contested the starting point of the limitation filed by the claimant for the receipt of the money on the basis of the note supportive of Article XXX Suite, Article XXXVII, RR 1, 2 and Section 96 Litigation Act (IX of 1908). An objection was raised about it. The trial court was also raised after the sanction of leave to defend the premises, and was told that under Article, 73, the Limitation Act, 8 190 appeal appeal, the appellant's arrest proceeding by appeal. I was brought up, the filing limit on the basis of the pro note was three years and under the preliminary point of limitation said that the article was the date of execution of the pro note, which would mean that the pro note did not exclude the execution date. The pro note in the case may have been executed on 12 1996 12 1996 and the last date when the case could go on. Can be filed, registered on 23 1999 1999 1999, but after fifteen days, due to the limitations of the case filed by the plaintiff, filed on 1 2000-1000, the trial decision and order Appeal against the motion as allowed by the trial court and judgment and order was set aside
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
