Section 5, Schedule and Section 11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The constitutional jurisdiction for restoration was recorded at the conclusion of the plaintiff's evidence and the plaintiff, who failed to examine the evidence presented by the plaintiff, Provide evidence of the last chance he was given, but he failed to present the same without justification and his defense was stopped. In the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, no provision was made that the evidence of this party will not be closed in any case. The matter was to be resolved as soon as possible and the court could close the evidence of a party that failed to include evidence without cause in accordance with Section 11 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act 1964, provided that the evidence On the due date, the Family Court will examine it. The witness presented by the parties, despite a caution on the last opportunity to present evidence in the present case, had the defendant not only failed to appear in court, but also the witnesses. Did not even present. It was, that the defendant's double default case was pending for more than 10 years, the defendant was given a last chance, but he did not even care to appear before the court in the trial court. In the circumstances, there was no illegal item in the illegal injunction to close the evidence that was justified.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
