Article 1 561 An Exploratory Code (XLV of 1860), accused of abolishing section 295c, allegedly held a commemoration ceremony in support of two books in which he was blasphemed against the Holy Prophet. The commentators were Zeelat and Aik Maulana Aik Kafir. A section containing such derogatory words with sacred persons and their accompanying accused D Section P (Legal), gazetted police officer, after the accusation of the charges, a report to the high police in connection with the crime under Section 295C Was submitted, PPC was done. Against the accused and others, where the FIR was registered and in this case Section P (Investigation) and Section P (Headquarters) Investigation were made, therefore, according to law, the trial court made three statements earlier Were filed. The material prosecution witness testifies against the accused accused of using the jury between himself and the High Court before the trial court dismisses the jurisdiction, nor does the trial by examining the statements of the prosecution witnesses The role of the court, which is likely to be short-lived in the trial, was highly inappropriate, but not legitimate, only in the jurisdiction of the High Court over the jurisdiction of the trial court. Before the trial court can overturn the proceedings, ignoring the normal procedure. Warranty exercise was identified through inherent jurisdiction for the application, before the case was dismissed.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
