Sections 497 (5) and 498 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), the cancellation of the pre-arrest bail, the rules for grant approval and the application for bail cancellation were quite different, but it was equally true when to grant bail. The verdict was declared illegal and contrary to the facts of the case, the High Court had sufficient powers to cancel it, in the present case the defendant / accused had received extraordinary relief before arrest in favor of the accused. The trial court granted the bail before arrest, under a risky sum of Rs. 3,41,50,000, based on faulty and airy fairies. Deepened the conflict of choice and discussed the value of the documents in question. During the pre-arrest bail decision, the trial court failed to consider the bail before arrest and to distinguish the difference between those after the arrest warrant. And without stating that the case was filed against the accused due to police or complainant misconduct, which was a prerequisite for giving the accused extraordinary relief from pre-arrest bail, which includes the possible restoration of blood / goons. ? Money, stolen / stolen property or other perishable material, rarely granted bail on bail before arrest, which was illegal, for reasons unrealistic and unlawful, was not sustainable.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
