Article 199 constitutional petition requires the prisoner to withdraw money from his National Savings Center through a girl who was in judicial lockup in a criminal case against him, because he was in judicial lockup and his daughters Need money for marriage. And the money will be directed from his account to the National Savings Center. The wife's sessions judge dismissed the plaintiff's request, referred the person in charge to the National Saving Center's superintendent of the district jail and directed the matter to proceed according to law. The petitioner claimed that the money was lying in the National Savings Center, which was tried to extract it was a matter of fraud and fraud. And the order was passed by the session judge as being immovable in nature. Was irresponsible and without any jurisdiction, it was the duty of the investigator to make all the efforts to recover the money by making the subject of alleged fraud if some of the money was in the defendant's account and he was married to his daughters. He wanted to do the same for the purposes. By his wife's request, his request cannot be denied. The session judge passed the order using all reasonable sanctions. The injunction was an innocent applicant who had been accused of fraud, he did not file any civil action to recover the money, which was allegedly the subject of fraud, the respondent was in this case and the session. The judge was the passenger of his legal rights order which was approved by the session judge, in the circumstances, he was within the mandate of his discretion and he was in the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
