Find a Lawyer

MAHMOOD JAVED versus SYED IJAZ ALI SHAH

A. XLI, R 27 and Section 115 documents were sought to prove the authenticated copies of the public records, and the Appellate Court required such evidence for effective decision of the case, while the respondents also had the opportunity to reject. The High Court refused to intervene in an unknown order. In use of the editorial jurisdiction

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• Mst. KALSOOM BEGUM v. MEMBER JUDICIAL, BOARD OF REVENUE 2009 MLD 1362
• RAZZAQ AHMAD v. State 2009 PCrLJ 1366
• MUHAMMAD AKRAM v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE 2009 YLR 1372
• BUTT FLOUR MILLS v. JUDGE BANKING COURT NO.1, GUJRANWALA 2009 CLD 1373
• MUSTAFA v. State 2009 YLR 1375
• MUHAMMAD ARIF MIAN v. ABDUL HAFEEZ 2009 PCrLJ 1379
• MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN v. CHAIRMAN, NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY, ISLAMABAD 2009 MLD 1381
• SHAKEEL AHMAD v. ABDUL GHAFFAR 2009 YLR 1384

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

famous supreme court advocate from Zahir Pir lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes