Subsequently, the trial court directed the plaintiff to submit the amount of gold e-sum within the stipulated period, but not for the plaintiff, under section 24 of the Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1991. The source could not be submitted. And the case was dismissed, however, the appellate court set aside the trial court's decision and directed the trial court to decide the matter on merit. The case was filed on January 8, 2006 and directed. Was to be deposited within 30 days on the loss. Section 24 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1991 submitted that the plaintiff submitted the gold 1 som on 8 1 2007, because there was a general holiday on 7 1 2007 because the defendant had to submit the gold som on 8 12 2006. It was directed that the day of 30th was to begin on 9-12 2006, because under the law, the day from which the gold deposit was ordered, the plaintiff should be excluded. There was no illegal act or error in submitting to EOM. 2007 Appellate Court was found to have committed an illegal or irregular or permanent error while it was not specifically identified by the defendant's lawyer in an unlawful order allowing the appeal, It cannot be interfered with in the exercise of the jurisdiction of the High Court. n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
