NOOR HUSSAIN versus CHIEF PROSECUTOR GENERAL, PUNJAB
Article 173 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Request The question was whether, after the Prosecutor General's opinion, the DSP could be postponed to submit a challan for seeking legal opinion and whether the same allegation was made in the preliminary inquiry. Was found? Subsequently, an innocent investigation was submitted to the SSP (Investigation), which the Deputy Prosecutor General recommended that the accused be challaned and presented before the sub-challan court, which was approved by the Prosecutor General Punjab, However, the responding police officer moved the request for legal action. The DSP's legal position will not make the investigating officer's opinion guilty or innocent, as his job is to collect only some material and make it to a competent court. To the public, who can accuse an accused of guilt or innocence, yet people spend time Demand and Investigation Officer Delay in Legal Action to Acquire Considerable Opinion of Glass Cutter General was in charge of the prosecution in the Punjab province and was supported by the Deputy Prosecutor General, but in the circumstances the DSP received a legal opinion or It was bad or due to the negligence of the law of the concerned police officer which resulted in the instruction to ensure the challan. OR In the light of the final inquiry conducted by the SSP (Investigation), a supplementary challan should be produced in the court and then the Prosecutor General's constitutional request be granted.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
