Find a Lawyer

KASHMIR RICE MILLS versus JUDGE BANKING COURT NO.1, GUJRANWALA

The transfer of the application for a suit filed by the bank in the bank's court under section 24 was an attempt to transfer the High Court's counsel to the plaintiff's bank, which it claimed was premature. And that the parties and the issues were not common and that the mortgagee / guarantor was not a party to the suit on the basis of financing, while the applicants had sued each other for damages, so it It would not be appropriate to move the matter to higher. Not possible as a normal or stable trial, due to the absence of the parties mentioned in the case filed by the court applicants.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• MUHAMMAD ISMAIL v. MUHAMMAD YOUSAF 2009 YLR 207
• SANWAL KHAN v. State 2009 YLR 211
• Mst. PARVEEN AMANUAL v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE-III, RAHIMYAR KHAN 2009 PLD 213
• Mirza IFTIKHAR MEHMOOD v. AREA MAGISTRATE, POLICE STATION NEKAPURA, SIALKOT 2009 PLD 215
• Mst. FATIMA v. Mst. BUDHAI 2009 MLD 216
• NOOR HUSSAIN v. CHIEF PROSECUTOR GENERAL, PUNJAB 2009 PLD 218
• Rao KHALID JAVAID v. FAIZ AHMAD 2009 PLD 220
• RAZIA BIBI v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SARGODHA 2009 YLR 222

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

advocate for immigration from Hunza Nagar lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes