Find a Lawyer

HABIB BANK LTD. versus SYED MUHAMMAD HAROON

Sections 9 and 15 of the Transfer of Property Act (I82 of I82), section 41, were granted by the bank a loan settlement suit auctioning the mortgaged property, as a general rule if the artificial real estate was under any one. Charges or mortgages or separations thereafter, Charges and Mortgages shall follow this transfer except in the case of ona snapper buyer buyer without such charges or assumption of mortgage duty judicial principles. r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY through General Manager v. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, MINES AND MINERAL, ATTOCK 2009 YLR 133
• RASOOLAN BIBI v. ADDITIONAL SESSION JUDGE 2009 PLD 135
• KAMRAN IQBAL v. D.G., F.I.A. 2009 PLD 137
• Mst. REHANA JALAL v. S.H.O. POLICE STATION KOT ADDU, 2009 PCrLJ 138
• ALI MUHAMMAD v. ALLAH DITTA 2009 YLR 140
• Syed KHURRAM SHAH v. Mian MUHAMMAD SHAHBAZ SHARIF 2009 PLD 140
• RIAZ AHMAD v. State 2009 PCrLJ 142
• GHULAM MURTAZA v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, NAROWAL 2009 YLR 146

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

best advocate from Bannu lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes