O VII, R 11, O VIII, R 10 & Section 115 Written statement, not to strike on defense defendant despite specific direction by the trial court, O VII, R 11 instead of filing written statement only preferential under CPC The petition was raised by the defendant in such a way that the written statement was not filed as he was not provided with the copy of the plaintiff as the defendant's conduct in this case was relevant since the day before. , Defendant sought delay and disappointment on the case by filing a petition under O VII, R 11 CPC first and then filing a written statement. If the defendant's argument, which has not been raised previously, demands multiple motions to stay, it cannot be raised that the High Court's plaintiff failed to identify any jurisdictional defect, legal weakness or section 115. Irregularities with the order passed by the trial court High Court under the jurisdiction of the review under CPC were denied, interference with the order pass d. The review by the trial court was dismissed in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
