Before the arrest of Article 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 302/109/148/149, a British-based defendant had conspired over the telephone in connection with the murder of the accused, though two witnesses were mentioned in the FIR Who were given information about the alleged conspiracy, but their sources of information about it were not disclosed, the record did not say that the complaining party had to save the victim's life. What steps were taken when the two were informed of the plot. The witness was presented to the Investigation Officer approximately one and a half years after the incident and one of them did not make any allegation against the accused and the other witness was insecure against the accused, in which the FIR Two other witnesses mentioned were also not mentioned, after 13 and 18 months after the incident, before the investigating officer in support of the allegations of misconduct against the accused so long as all these testimonies are questionable. There were questions and the evidence was yet to be determined by the trial court so that after the evidence was recorded, the accused was absconding. Can not find the evidence, admitting that he was overseas case against the accused before the event. Need further investigation, given the facts and circumstances mentioned, the accused joined the investigation and his person did not need any recovery, the ad interim arrest warrant was already given to the accused, confirming the circumstances. Had happened
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
