Section 27 of the Special Relief Act (Constitution of 1877), Section 12 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition for the specific performance of the contract to sell the payment of additional stamp duty pending suit, the defendant died and Legal representatives of the agreement entered into an agreement. The plaintiff and the plaintiff were ordered, pursuant to the aforesaid injunction, the sale proceedings were made, saying that the legal representatives of the deceased defendants Rs 40,00,000 instead of Rs. 35,00,000 and The complainant, who filed a stamp duty of Rs 80,000, stated in his constitutional petition that the legal representative of the deceased defendants was not registering the sale deed and insisted that the stamp act, According to the Value List issued under Section 27A of 1899, the plaintiff should pay stamp duty; the sub-registrar was not able to ignore the court order. Instruct the parties or parties to pay stamp duty on the inflation and pricing tables The lawsuit was filed against collectors, who had no legal basis or sanctity. The defendants had no legal authority to demand payment of additional stamps to the plaintiffs The defendants were bound by the terms of the decree and the process of sale which proceeded in accordance with its terms and otherwise the appropriate postage. Ticket duty is being heard, of course on payment of other necessary charges like payment fees etc.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
