Sections 15, 19, 20 and 21 of the case for pre-waiver waiver, the defendant resigning from the lawsuit, who claimed premature rights as the son of the seller of the suit property, the defendant The trial court ordered the trial, but the appellate court overturned the trial court's finding and dismissed section 19 of the legality of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1913, provided that no one was allowed The property seller can give notice to anyone who has the right to pre-empt expense. Such notice shall be given by a court of jurisdiction in the area where it was stated that Section 20 of the Punjab Pre-Impression Act, 1913 was located in which a person was granted pre-ownership rights. The person whose notice was taken under section 19 of the Act shall be extinguished, unless such person shall file a notice in court for the service, for a period of three months from the date of the said service. There was no evidence on the vendor of his intention to enforce his former right of entitlement that there was no evidence to support the notion that the emperor had, in any way, before him. Having previously waived the right or was prevented from filing a lawsuit, the appellate court was defective, lacked evidence and was responsible for interfering with the second appeal. The decision and the order passed by the appellate court were set aside and the defendant was the person to decide the case through the trial. Restore
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
