In section 5A, 13 (2) (i) and 15 rent increases, the default landlord alleges that the landlord has already applied for eviction of the tenant by default in payment of rent. It was reported that despite the agreement and then the legal increase in rent, the reimbursement of rent was not paid by the tenant and the rent controller and appellate authority from time to time claimed that the tenant demanded any decision. Or there was no evidence that the tenancy agreement was specifically mentioned. That after the expiry of three years, the rent will be increased in accordance with the law, Section 5A of the West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance, 1959 stipulated that the three months expiry. The rent will automatically increase by 25%. The legal increase in the year of the tenancy agreement was not an example of the jurisdiction of the tenant and under this condition, a 25% increase in rent would occur after the tenant's three-year term on which the notice had to be submitted. Was. The demand for a legal house was not available to the landlord; both parties were fully aware that the tenant had to increase according to the law after the expiry of three years, but failed to do so. It was also given notice to the tenant to file the first eviction application stating that he had made a pre-contractual agreement not to pay the rent with this legal increase, rented by the tenant. The payment was deliberate by default, and it was correctly rented
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
