Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus STATE

Sections 497 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 337 F (vi) / 337 L (ii), 148 and 149 guarantees were established on Prima Ficci's grant record that the injury attributable to the co-accused was not found on the left wrist. The prosecution case against a co-accused suspect is extremely suspicious, according to the Meadow Legal report. The accused allegedly injured two back arms in the back of the injured, which was granted bail by the four accused. ? The rule of consistency requires that the accused be released on bail as well

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• LIAQAT ALI alias FAUJI v. State 2009 MLD 980
• ABBAS AHMAD v. Mst. AYESHA AZIZ 2009 CLC 980
• ALLY BROTHERS AND COMPANY (PAK) LTD. v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Cabinet Secretary 2009 YLR 982
• TALIB HUSSAIN v. Mst. YASMIN ARA 2009 PCrLJ 982
• ABDUL MAJEED v. MUHAMMAD YAQOOB 2009 YLR 989
• NAZAN BIBI v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, JHANG 2009 YLR 991
• MUHAMMAD KHALIL SHAH v. PROVINCIAL STANDING MEDICAL BOARD 2009 MLD 993
• FIDA HUSSAIN v. MUHAMMAD SHAH 2009 YLR 996

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

power of attorney advocate Saidu Sharif lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes