MUHAMMAD ASLAM, LUMBERDAR versus SUB-DIVISIONAL CANAL OFFICER, FAISALABAD
Section 68A Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O XXXXX, Rr 1 and 2 Interim Order, Re-Demanding for Water Course Restoration, Temporary Arrangement (Water Course) was passing through the plaintiff's land which terminated it and Sued In order to prevent canal authorities from exercising jurisdiction under section 68A of the Canal and Sewage Act, 1873, the trial court granted interim jurisdiction by the canal authorities under section 68A of the Canal and Drainage Act 1873. The order refused, but the lower appellate court granted the request and granted that the interim order in favor of the plaintiff was made with the mutual consent of the parties and that he was proceeding on the spot, then the question is: Whether section 68A of the Canal and Drainage Act 1873 will be applicable as it is not sanctioned and is mentioned in the Compact Plan The same decision was to be made by the parties after recording the evidence of the parties, when the water course was present, T and the defendants and others were irrigating their land through this waterway, then, irreparable damage and convenience. The initial components of the balance were leaning in favor of the defendant. Otherwise, the defendant and others continued to use the water course in question to irrigate their land even after the purchase. The plaintiffs had been in the land for more than 2/3 years with their mutual acquaintance and consent, and the termination of the waterway would apparently have resulted in the plaintiff's approval of the interim injunction granting the injunction. The High Court reverses the lower appellate court-approved order, exercising jurisdiction over the review.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
