Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus STATE


The accused behind the supply of copies of the documents under Section 265C, Section 265C, CRPC, was to supply statements and documents, so that he could inform him of the charges / allegations leveled against him. Maybe. Providing answers to the questions that may be put before them when making charges, without which the allegation is absolutely irrelevant will enable the defendant to defend himself against the allegation. Will not be complied with. The provision of the law can certainly jeopardize his right to a fair and impartial trial. The accused had the legal right to keep copies of all the documents mentioned in Section 265C, CR PC before the trial began and charged. Even if this was a complaint, the authority to supply such documents in accordance with the provisions of Section 265C would have made the CCP fail all the case. \ R \ n

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocate from Kumbh lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.