Section 13 and 15 (6), the concurrence of the discovery by the two courts below the foregoing profession in the interest of the tenants, in the interest of the tenants, the appointment of the jurisdiction of the tenant controller was that the land was not the landlord's The house was built with the consent of professional professionals. Of the tenants, the local commission was appointed to limit the land and on the basis of the report submitted by the local commission, the eviction order was approved, which was applied by the tenants to the lower appellate court. That was, the ent rent controller did not have the authority to make a local appointment. Commission property tenant, jurisdiction of the tenant in the presence of foreclosure questions in the interest of the tenants, rather than pointing out any jurisdiction, legal weakness, material irregularity, misrepresentation and non-reading of the record In the interest of the tenants concerned, the Local Commission submitted itself in the jurisdiction of the Rent Controller to determine in advance and to resolve this dispute, a local commission should be appointed to construct the land on which to cover Was built, both courts carefully appreciate the record of the case, and finally In concluding that the landlord was entitled to dismiss the tenants, the High Court refused to interfere in the unanimous search. The second appeal was dropped from the lower two courts. \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
