Find a Lawyer

MUSTAFA versus STATE

Definition of Section 2302 (b) Evidence Testimony The police did not name any of the accused's brother and the deceased brother's witness immediately after the incident occurred and did not provide details of the incident. Accepted as death and initiation of proceedings under Section 174, the PC Brother of CR's deceased, who was the first to locate and identify the body, was dropped by the prosecution as a witness, eye witnesses There was no incident that led to the ocular testimony being denied. Through medical evidence and the investigating officer's prosecution case was filled with suspicion, the accused was acquitted

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• Mst. ROBINA ASHRAF v. Mst. SHAGUFTA FARDOUS 2009 PCrLJ 1189
• TOWN MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION through Town Nazim v. MUHAMMAD BANARAS KHAN 2009 CLC 1191
• MUHAMMAD ANWAR alias AMBA v. State 2009 YLR 1191
• MUHAMMAD SOHAIL SARWAR v. Mst. HINA YOUNAS 2009 MLD 1195
• SHAH'S IMPEX INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. through Sikander Ali v. IDBP through Authorized Officer 2009 CLD 1203
• Mst. RUKIA BIVI v. STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN through Chairman 2009 CLD 1213
• Mirza MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. Syed MUSTAJAB HUSSAIN 2009 YLR 1214
• MANZOOR AHMAD v. ELECTION TRIBUNAL FOR FAISALABAD DISTRICT 2009 MLD 1214

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

property advocates from Jamrud Road lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes