Find a Lawyer

FALAK SHER versus STATE

Section 2302 (b) definition of evidence suspected Hecht's recovery from the suspects was suspicious as the incident did not occur as the eyewitnesses did not see the incident, which was called from another district. The whole story was defended. Many errors were committed by the prosecution after deliberation and consultation and every effort was made to address the deficiencies in the case, the prosecution's case met with serious doubts and material contradictions. On the day of the trial, the accused was not being admitted to the trial court by the accused. In this context, the judgment drawn by the trial court was rejected. The accused was acquitted in the circumstances. Was done

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• Mirza MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. Syed MUSTAJAB HUSSAIN 2009 YLR 1214
• MANZOOR AHMAD v. ELECTION TRIBUNAL FOR FAISALABAD DISTRICT 2009 MLD 1214
• NISHAT IMPEX (PVT.) LTD. Through Representative v. HABIB BANK LTD. through Duly Authorized Attorneys 2009 CLD 1215
• ASHIQ ALI CHAUDHRY v. BORDER AREA COMMITTEE through Chairman and Civil Member, Lahore 2009 YLR 1218
• DAWOOD TEXTILE PRINTING INDUSTRIES (PVT). LTD., FAISALABAD through Chief\' Executive v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Revenue Division, F.B.R. 2009 PTD 1220
• MUHAMMAD KHURRAM MIRZA v. SMALL MEDIUM ENTERPRISES BANK (SME) through Branch Manager 2009 CLD 1221
• MUHAMMAD SARWAR alias PAPU v. State 2009 PCrLJ 1221
• Mian SULTAN AHMED v. ALLIED BANK LIMITED through Manager 2009 CLD 1224

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

family advocate from Jaranwala lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes