Find a Lawyer

ASHIQ ALI CHAUDHRY versus BORDER AREA COMMITTEE THROUGH CHAIRMAN AND CIVIL MEMBER, LAHORE

Regulations 5 and 6 General Clauses Act (X of 1897), Section 24 A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application rejecting the application for approval of the ex post facto, without the mere mention of the confession by the Border Area Committee Why was the NOC denied, which caused irreparable harm to the shopkeeper because in the case of the ex post facto prohibition, he was deprived of his property due to his payment, The defamation order was illegal and illegal. It will be considered as a matter of postponement by the High Court and the parties have reduced the border area. Will be presented in front of the TV rules.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• Mst. RUKIA BIVI v. STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN through Chairman 2009 CLD 1213
• Mirza MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. Syed MUSTAJAB HUSSAIN 2009 YLR 1214
• MANZOOR AHMAD v. ELECTION TRIBUNAL FOR FAISALABAD DISTRICT 2009 MLD 1214
• NISHAT IMPEX (PVT.) LTD. Through Representative v. HABIB BANK LTD. through Duly Authorized Attorneys 2009 CLD 1215
• FALAK SHER v. State 2009 MLD 1219
• DAWOOD TEXTILE PRINTING INDUSTRIES (PVT). LTD., FAISALABAD through Chief\' Executive v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Revenue Division, F.B.R. 2009 PTD 1220
• MUHAMMAD KHURRAM MIRZA v. SMALL MEDIUM ENTERPRISES BANK (SME) through Branch Manager 2009 CLD 1221
• MUHAMMAD SARWAR alias PAPU v. State 2009 PCrLJ 1221

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

family advocate from Ahmadpur East lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes