36, 67 and 72 Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 Intra-Court Appeal for Examination of Excluded Votes The appellant / undoubted candidates in their election petition requested that the excluded votes be examined. And the correct votes cast in favor of returning candidates, along with the illegal election tribunal, were also attended by the High Court's single bench in the second part of the petitioner's prayer. And the petition sought in connection with the scrutiny of the excluded votes was not attended in Rule 36 (3) of the Punjab Local Government Election Rules, 2005, but before the counting results were consolidated, the Returning Officer removed the ballot papers. Will check. By counting by the presiding officer. And if he knew that any such ballot paper should not have been eliminated that much, then he would count it as a ballot for the contesting candidates for whom the vote cast would otherwise I was done In light of the provisions of the law, there was no doubt that the election petition contained sufficient details and specific allegations regarding the removal of the controversial ballot papers. And because they were not examined by the Returning Officer Intra-Court, they were partially allowed because the Election Tribunal rejected the appellant's request for the ballot papers to be examined. The order passed was declared without legal authority and was set aside. The invalid result will be that the election application is considered pending and the parties present to the Election Tribunal the acquisition of election records and
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
