Find a Lawyer

LIEUT. MUHAMMAD ASJID IQBAL versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Section 65 (10) (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petitioner petitioner held that he was in custody and was not allowed to work and work and Section 65 (10) (b) Supplying the confiscation of his salaries and allowances every day in the Pakistan Army Act, 1952 was against the integration of Islam and he had the right to pay, the High Court allowed the constitutional petition and the authorities paid the applicant cash. Directed to pay. Namely salaries and allowances for a specified set of rules

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• SHAIKII SALIM ALI (PVT.) LTD. through Managing Director v. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, LAHORE 2009 PTD 1274
• Malik GUL RAIZ AWAN v. Mst. ASMA GUL RAIZ 2009 MLD 1274
• SALIM AKRAM v. Shebzada BADR MUNIR 2009 YLR 1277
• MUHAMMAD HANEEF SHAH v. MUHAMMAD KHALIL AHMAD SHAH 2009 PCrLJ 1281
• MUNSHI MUHAMMAD v. DISTRICT OFFICER (REVENUE), GUJRANWALA 2009 CLC 1285
• MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. GHULAM SAFDAR 2009 YLR 1287
• Syed ESAR HUSSAIN NAQVI v. D.C.O. NANKANA SAHIB 2009 MLD 1287
• Mst. FAYYAZI BEGUM v. ALI HASSAN 2009 CLC 1289

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

immigration advocate from Nooriabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes