Sections 13, 24 & 24 of the case were submitted within the stipulated time to submit the deposits of the plaintiff, in compliance with the direction of the trial court, after which the plaintiff himself filed that the suit. The trial court granted wrong order in relation to the amount. Zaraimom, under which the order was ordered to deposit less money, did not object to the permission to deposit the balance amount, the defendant did not object, the balance amount was deposited by the plaintiff by the trial court. The case went on to dismiss the case that the plaintiff failed to submit. The appellate court, however, declared the entire case formally and submitted it to the plaintiff under the lawsuit. The plaintiff had ever objected to the same plaintiff himself, he had pointed out the error in the court and asked for permission to submit the required amount to SU, with the consent of the court, the court and all the concerned persons. And this fact was in fact, Section 24 of the Punjab Pre-Empathy Act 1991 was primarily imposed in court so that the plaintiff needed to submit. During the stipulated period of the law, 1 / 3rd of the sale price in cash, however, banned the extension of the 30-day period from the filing of the suit to the court, such order was passed and the plaintiff passed. Had complied with it. From time to time, the appellate court has applied for the rule of actus curiae muenium gravity (no court act will prejudice anyone) and has ruled in this case.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
