Article 426 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), the suspension of section 302 (b) / 149 sentence, the petition for the accusation against the applicant / accused was that he had injured the right knee of the gunman 12 petition. The defendant's lawyer stated that the injury attributable to the applicant through the prosecution may have been the result of the firing by the co-accused, and that the injury, otherwise, was not the result of a free fire that the applicant had not known for a long time. Was in jail and had no chance. Keeping the applicant detained indefinitely in jail due to a hearing of important appeal in the near future will not prove to be a beneficial motive for the prosecution, otherwise, the applicant's case was equivalent to that of a co-accused. Has been approved. Applicant deserved the same treatment by the High Court.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
