FESCO LIMITED THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE, FAISALABAD versus LIAQAT ALI
Section 54C [as amended by the Electricity (Amendment) Ordinance (LXII of 1979]] Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Sections 42 and 54 of the Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), A. XXXX, R1, 2 and Section 115 suit for OLX, RR 1 and 2, application for a stay order under CPC trial and permanent injunction restraining application, after the court filed an appeal against the trial court's decision, the appellate court stayed the trial. On the amended order of the Court, the request for deposit of half the amount of the Detection Bill was approved and subject to the payment of 1 / 4th of the Detection Bill, under Section 54C of the Electricity Act 1910. When Until the arrears of electricity were not submitted to the court, the order to temporarily ban the injunction would be in violation of the express provisions of the Electricity Act 1910, for the plaintiff / user bound to cease to supply the authorities, below the courts. The orders for submission of 1/2 or 1 / 4th of the source tracking bill were clearly against the provisions of section 454C, as amended by the Electricity Act 1910, which could not be sustained by the courts below the consumer / claimant. Could have been allowed if he had deposited the entire amount of the trackable bill order accordingly.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
