SAYYIDA SHEHNAZ BATOOL versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, LAHORE
Section 13 Punjab Government Servants Housing Foundation Rules, 2005, Section 4 and 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973) Article, Article 199 Constitutional application Special discount effect to Government employees Respondents provided housing to government employees or houses without any loss of them. Introduced a scheme for After receiving the membership of the deceased husband's family during the service, the families received the membership of the Foundation and the applicant along with other legal heirs was allotted the house. Respondents provided the applicant with construction and development charges. Issuing the notice, demanding otherwise the applicant's rights had to be lost, the defendant's decision was that the defendant's decision was not to receive anything from the widow and legal heirs of the slain employees, who died during the service. Once the concessions were announced and by the government It was advertised. In the event that the section of the letter and spirit and the duty to enforce it by its officials is damaged, the legacies of the deceased employees cannot be denied such privileges. Death can not be inflicted by dentist. According to the conditions laid down in the brochure, when the service was allowed a discount, it was the duty of the concerned authorities to amend the rules for its implementation, the High Court accepted the constitutional request and the notice of demand issued by the respondents. Constitutional application was accepted keeping aside. r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
