MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus MEMBER (JUDICIAL-I), BOARD OF REVENUE PUNJAB, LAHORE
AR (Constitution of Pakistan) (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for appointment of temporary limber holder Wright Right Petitioner regrets the order passed by the authorities under which he was not appointed as a permanent limber holder, Had appointed a permanent appointment as temporary lumberman for a considerable period. Under the R17 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Rules, 1968, the lumber was the exclusive discretion of the revenue authorities and the recommendation of the revenue-enhancing officers adds weight and should not be overlooked. Petitioner could not just claim that he had worked for some people. For years as a temporary lumberman, he was neither recommended by the taxation staff nor appointed by any of the boards to the Board of Revenue, a good field for appointing highly qualified qualified applicants. May be proven but in the absence of its recommendation it can be ignored. Revenue from the Patwari to Tehsildar and the earning staff's trust in the candidate who has been working with them for a long time should not be neglected unless the selection of Revenue Authorities who appoint a permanent lumberman should be ignored. There are no gross irregularities in the appointment of the High Court. Interference with special selection of excise options to set a permanent lien petition is denied in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
