Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE versus S. H.O.

Article 62 and 68 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Article 411/109 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 FIR The Constitution of the Forest Department agrees to submit the value of forestry to the trial under section ? Under section 62 of the Forest Act, 1927 and the settlement stolen the Department under the Department of Forestry Act, Section 68 of the Forestry Act, 1927, the value of the stolen forest has not been obtained, nor can any case be filed, nor the applicant. It can be fined twice. The offense was inappropriate and serious to further litigation against the applicant in connection with the same crime.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• Rana ABDUL JABBAR v. Mst. RAZIA BEGUM 2009 YLR 2211
• Mst. HANEEFAN BIBI v. DISTRICT JUDGE, LODHRAN 2009 YLR 2215
• PAKISTAN POST OFFICE through Post Master General v. PRINCIPAL DIVISIONAL PUBLIC SCHOOL AND COLLEGE, SAHIWAL 2009 YLR 2217
• JAMAT ALI v. MUHAMMAD AFZAL 2009 YLR 2224
• Mst. NASIM AKHTAR TAHIR v. Syed ZAFAR ABBAS GILLANI 2009 YLR 2229
• MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. MEMBER (JUDICIAL-I), BOARD OF REVENUE PUNJAB, LAHORE 2009 YLR 2238
• MUHAMMAD NAWAZ alias BAMBU v. State 2009 YLR 2241
• MUHAMMAD AJMAL v. ELECTION TRIBUNAL, LAHORE 2009 YLR 2253

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

law firms from Gujar Khan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes