Find a Lawyer

ALLAH DITTA versus D.C.O.

Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Jurisdiction The High Court in the exercise of the discharge from the chemical plant of a factory in a water stream and the use of the SO Moto Constitutional Jurisdiction that would endanger the health of residents and animals. Took notice of After such notice by the factory, the factory's improvement and justification by its factory was not found to be a threat to environmental protection. The BSNISO 9001 2000 certificate was revealed to be valid by December 2008. Complies with the plant quality assurance standards. According to reports from the EPA and other agencies, up to the level of affinities and waste management, the High Court refused to take any further action against the factory but directed them to keep the project environmentally friendly otherwise fresh action would be taken. Took action against them. And that the FI rupees and other operations have been initiated for their illegal operations against the factory, which will continue and the merit will be decided.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN v. NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN through Assistant Vice President/Chief Manager 2009 CLD 812
• ASIF IQBAL v. GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Home Secretary 2009 PCrLJ 816
• MUHAMMAD SHARIF v. DISTRICT JUDGE, TOBA TEK SINGH 2009 MLD 816
• AZHAR SIDDIQUE v. DISTRICT OFFICER (REVENUE), GUJRAT 2009 CLC 819
• ASHIQ ALI v. DEPUTY INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB, LAHORE 2009 PCrLJ 830
• Malik ZAFAR IQBAL v. JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, SHAKARGARH DISTRICT NAROWAL 2009 CLC 835
• HIRA TEXTILE MILLS LTD. through Director v. EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER (REVENUE), KASUR 2009 CLD 839
• Malik KHALID HUSSAIN v. State 2009 PCrLJ 840

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

immigration advocates from Upper Deval lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes