AZHAR IQBAL versus STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH CHAIRMAN
Section 118 Life Insurance Partner Plans Insurance Policy Rejects Insurance Contracts by the Insurance Corporation, which, admittedly, was not established for a short period after the policy break, which was restored on 14 January 1998. Was found, against the claim of the appellant (insured husband) by the insurance tribunal from the Insurance Tribunal along with the lady's re-insurance corporation that the appellant and his wife failed to disclose. That she was pregnant and finally died in the labor room on 26 2 1999 due to excessive bleeding. A. Only the two policyholders (husband and wife) were found sufficient to prove the fact that the insurance corporation and the insurance tribunal ignored the basic fact that the woman's death in the labor room on 26 2 1999. Table 14 1 could not be pregnant on 1998, the day the policy was restored when the time difference between revisions of the policy was recognized and the woman was initially examined and her death date was 12 months from 26 2 1999. It was high, no contract, no insurance rules or otherwise expect her to announce a woman in mid-January There may be an insurance corporation in the next two months. Failure to establish its case to support the insurance contract breach by any careful and relevant evidence, therefore, all such indications would be against the insurance corporation which supports the denial of the insurance contract. There was a need to do so, however, and present them to the appellant. Copy of insurance policy
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
