Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD HANIF versus STATE


Section 497 Preamble Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302148/149/109/337 H (ii) Bail, bail bail The High Court, in the previous period of litigation, rejected three co-accused for vacation. The criminal went to the plea. Bail was granted by the Supreme Court to appeal against the High Court order that the accused filed a bail plea after the Supreme Court verdict, but on the basis of which he has been discharged. No fresh evidence was available. The request may be filed by him, was not acceptable. The previous High Court order was allowed to be withdrawn unless the lawyer had withdrawn the application without opening the applicant's arguments and reserving the right to repeat the application on the same or fresh basis. Accordingly, the decision of the accused of the Supreme Court was accepted on bail

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of supreme court advocates from Sohawa District Daska lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.