Section 122 and 123 Gift Mutational Theory of Applying Mirzam Almut To the plaintiff's disclosure regarding the harmony of the two courts, the dismissal of the plaintiff by his mother was a gift mutation affirmed by his mother, who was his half-brother. Both the court was rejected as well as the claim and claim filed by the plaintiff. The plaintiff raised by the plaintiff was that her mother died 45 days after confirming that the gift had changed in favor of the defendants, then she was under the ineffective influence of the donor defendants at the age of 100, There was no evidence that the plaintiff was sued. For whatever reason the donor should give his older son any reason to deprive him of his landed property, the donor at the time was admittedly in the care of the defendants and fully relied on them. In his hand was just a gift that was recorded on top of the gift. And on 23 2 1987 it was approved and the donor died on 10 4 1987, ie, 45 days after the confirmation day, the gift change was more likely than the donor's chance of survival, which affected the mental capacity, The donor could not make a valid gift as a free man with physical weakness and old age 23 23 2 1987 Donor Miz Almut was free and did not have the free will to consent conscientiously to the transaction. The deputy of the riot verdict was affected and the decisions passed by the trial court and the lower appellate court were the result of not writing the material and reading the material evidence. Islamic law and the provisions of this section and perfect departure 1
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
