It was not known about the Section 497 Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), Section 392 bail, the refusal of the robber to snatch the cellphone from the complainant before Section H adopted the unnecessary novel procedure in the law while at the police station. Held inside the identity parade of the accused person. There is no law clause that allows him to investigate or allow the identification parade of an unidentified suspect inside a police station while under custody in a police lockup under his supervision, judicial lock in this case under the law You need to get the detainees in custody. Without wasting a moment and not showing the complainant, so that they could be examined under the prison parade under the direct supervision of the deposed magistrate by the session judge, Section HA failed to perform the duty. He was dismissed by the law and prosecuted at the investigative stage and practically acquitted of the charge. Police report kept the identity parade at the lockup by the complainant inside the police lockup. The identity of the accused is neither relevant nor is there any admissible evidence in the evidence that proved himself to be a criminal and ruler. The law had caused havoc with this system, even though the state affairs suspect could not get arbitrary relief from bail because he had succeeded through the door in favor of Section H, by adopting some defective equipment. Excluded, in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
