MUHAMMAD KHURRAM MIRZA versus SMALL MEDIUM ENTERPRISES BANK (SME) THROUGH BRANCH MANAGER
Sections 9, 10 and 22 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O VII, R 10 The plaintiff's return to appear for a suit for debt collection and a defense claim strengthened various matters of procedure for the plaintiff in one paragraph. , That is, they were threatened and harassed by the defendants. Rs 10,000 was also paid as a result of the defendant's behavior by the plaintiff. There were various reasons for this as all of them came up at one time and the only place that was an arplant was declared. Was the cause of the action. There was a slight disagreement over the place but the previous paragraph of the plaint, was it not permitted by law to file two separate cases before two different courts for the same reason, to decide all the reasons for the proceedings by one Had The same court, in a territorial and illegal jurisdiction, was, in the circumstances, rightfully returned by trial to the trial court under OVII, R 10, by the CPC's order of the trial court. Had appealed against, they were dismissed under the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
