Find a Lawyer

SYED TAUSEEF SHAH versus CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD

Used in Sections 92 & A 89A \ Motion \ Convocation Word \ Motion \ As Section 2, Punjab Local Government Ordinance, \ 2001 and phrases in the Union Council phrase \ Resolution \ as included in Section A89A , The ordinances are not interchangeable \ motions. In the parliamentary process in Pakistan, it simply means asking a question about which members of a House to hold to express their opinions or decisions; and if and when such decisions are taken, or the House If the motion is accepted or approved by, it becomes the resolution of the House \ r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• DAWOOD TEXTILE PRINTING INDUSTRIES (PVT). LTD., FAISALABAD through Chief\' Executive v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Revenue Division, F.B.R. 2009 PTD 1220
• MUHAMMAD KHURRAM MIRZA v. SMALL MEDIUM ENTERPRISES BANK (SME) through Branch Manager 2009 CLD 1221
• MUHAMMAD SARWAR alias PAPU v. State 2009 PCrLJ 1221
• Mian SULTAN AHMED v. ALLIED BANK LIMITED through Manager 2009 CLD 1224
• GUL BADSHAH v. State 2009 MLD 1230
• ABDUR REHMAN v. State 2009 YLR 1230
• ZIA-UL-HASSAN SHAD v. BAHUDDIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN through Vice-Chancellor 2009 YLR 1237
• ALL PAKISTAN TEXTILE MILLS ASSOCIATION through Secretary v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Commerce, Ministry of Commerce, Islamabad 2009 CLD 1242

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

advocates from Layyah lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes