The testimony of Section 9 (c) evidence recovered 176kg of hashish, 70kg of opium and 3kg of heroin, which was recovered from the covert itch of the accused-driven truck, which was section 342, Cr. It is based on its statement given under PC. , And because of the defense's failure to investigate the recovery witness, all tests conducted by the chemical inspector of recovered drug samples were positive and the police and excise personnel were good witnesses like any other, There was no illegal desire or enmity. The accused may be a witness to the complainant as well as a witness to falsely implicate him, without the prosecution having a negative effect on the case, however, in the present case the complainant did not investigate himself. That is, the prosecution's witnesses were persistent and unanimously accused of all material aspects of the case had subsequently failed to reject the notion of criminal liability associated with it. Recovery of drugs from his possession, as prescribed under Section 29 of the Control of Narcotic Materials Act 1997, 1997, the accused was carrying the said heavy drug for sale, confirming the conviction and the death sentence of the accused. Done
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
