A complaint was filed against the applicants for the appreciation of the provisions of Sections 2 (c), 3, 4 and 7, claiming that the disputed house was delivered to the applicants / accused for use as residence. About 5/6 years before filing. The complaint is on the condition that the applicants will provide him with domestic services in return. Respondent / Complainant's position was that since the applicants refused to serve, they changed their status to the illegal occupants of the house and they occupied the house. In question, he was liable to be punished and the possession of the house was to be restored to him. The body had entered or intended to expel the lawful owner or occupier of any property. And thus wanted to seize, control or occupy this property. In the present case, such incident was not present at all. Applicants / accused were included in the house under oral agreement by the owner / complainant. Applicants will provide household goods. Applicant's entry into the service home was a valid entry because the tenants were in legitimate possession of the applicant under the terms of Section 2 (c) of the Unlawful Disposition Act 2005, so the complaint filed by the defendant was perfectly valid. Didn't see. They have the appropriate eligibility to approve the applicants' application under section 6565K, CCPC, pending trial.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
