The testimony of Section 9 (c) evidence showed that huge quantities of prohibited heroin were found in secret cavities behind the driver's seat of a wooden bus and the defendants could not say that they had no information about the recovered substance. Is. The trial judge's case proved successful and the trial judge's erroneous conclusion was based on the correct premise and the principle of definition of evidence was established to guarantee interference with the trial court's decision. However, there was no evidence against the accused to prove that they were either drug dealers, ex-offenders or had previously been involved in such activities. The issue of reduction in punishment for the accused can be considered as the conviction of the accused was severe and the sentence of five years is required to be reduced to three, reducing the RI given to the accused. Was ordered to do the year and accordingly a fine of one lakh rupees each was made to ten thousand rupees, ly r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
