Section 302 (b) of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance (XXII of 2000), the charge of appreciating section 7 evidence was first raised on the accused's inferiority before the accused on trial was neither such There was outrage over the issue of youth. At the time of submission of the challan neither before the magistrate, nor at the stage of bail, nor before the trial court, even in the age of the statement made under section 342, the CCP raised no objection. Gone, the form bay and school leaving certificate were not trustworthy documents, as his certified copies were not available on record. And in photocopied copies of certified copies, more was written in the year of the accused's birth, under Section 342, CRPC, the accused's age was recorded at 21 years, which was part of the judicial record and Was estimated. Unless, in the presence of a medical officer, the recorded death sentence was denied, the testimony of the two witnesses was corroborated by untrue testimony, neither the defendant nor the witness, no misconduct against the accused. Or non-malicious indication or consultation must be the result The hereditary evidence also confirmed the deceased's statement as well as the statements of four eyewitnesses who did not declare the deceased's post-mortem performance in litigation. Was established, because it was established that the death was pro-direct and directly related to the death of the dead with firearms. The reasons were not, request an autopsy in the area of legal heirs of the deceased and medico-legal report
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
