WAHEEDULLAH versus VICE-CHANCELLOR, GOMAL UNIVERSITY, D.I. KHAN
Section 54, it declaration and Su 55 Sue's Declaration and Permanent Order Removal The plaintiff permanently came up with a claimant for a dismissal order that he was appointed as an Assistant Assistant and the authorities illegally removed him from employment. And officials say action is taking place. Was illegal, with no jurisdiction, no rights of the plaintiff and a decree for permanent, prohibited and mandatory injunction was granted and the defendant's services to the defendant in both the trial court and the appellate court And prevent interference. The case was dismissed, the preliminary order of the applicant's appointment was made as an ad hoc appointment on the payment of the fixed cash, the Sid order was extended for six more months, but eventually the services of the plaintiff were terminated. The appointment was purely on a temporary basis, which does not guarantee its extension or validation. In that case, the plaintiff had no right to be provoked in civil court nor to claim for self-certification. There is no Luxury Standby because the findings of the two courts below were in accordance with law, justice and justice, and the principles established by the definition of evidence They were based on. Could not interfere with the High Court dismissing its amended jurisdiction request
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
