GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. THROUGH COLLECTOR DISTRICT MARDAN versus MUHAMMAD AYAZ
Sections 4, 11, 18, 23 and 54 Land Acquisition Compensation of the paid land received from the referee's Court of Appeal landowners and the Land Acquisition Collector paid Rs 846/26 per marl. The landowners did not, and after hearing the lawyer for the parties and hearing the data available on the record, filed a reference petition under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, which provoked each and every authority. Upon being satisfied, the compensation increases by Rs. 3500. Regular first appeal was filed in referee court's decision The Land Acquisition Review site plan will show that the suit land is an equal footing on Main Road and was not only of a commercial nature, but also of construction of buildings. Suitable for: It was fully proved that the tract of land was located on the main metal road, and the RAW number in front of the disputed site, which touched the main road, was obtained from the landowners. ? In this case, the record of the case of the high probability nature of the suit land proves that the confession of the advice of the authorities, that the acquired land was `Shah Canal, as recorded in the record of the revenue and that the land was estimated. Should have done As the acquiring court `` Shah Nahri '', there was no substance that this land could be recorded as `` Shah Nahri '', but the court did not consider the location of the land, its high potential and its proximity. Had to take care of that too. Up to the road to determine if it can be used for building purposes, a one-year average is always a good way to determine the market value of the acquired land.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
