Find a Lawyer

HAJI MUHAMMAD NOOR versus THE STATE AND ANOTHER THROUGH L.RS.

The Section 497 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), the denial of Section 17 (4) bail, indicated that the accused was directly named by the complainant. The defendant was later found to be in possession of the same, but after the payment of the ransom, the complainant was not assisted by the complainant with the affected accused and other co-accused, because the offense The offense was not eligible Once the accused was sought for bail the High Court dismissed the available facts of the prima fee case and the facts related to it which was against the accused which led to He was not entitled to guaranteed privileges.

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009

• MANZOOR v. State 2009 MLD 309
• SUHAIL v. State 2009 PCrLJ 312
• MUHAMMAD BILAL v. State 2009 MLD 335
• GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. through Collector District Mardan v. MUHAMMAD AYAZ 2009 CLC 338
• SANAULLAH KHAN v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE-V, BANNU 2009 CLC 351
• THE STATE through Advocate General, N.-W.F.P. Peshawar v. KHALWAT KHAN 2009 MLD 362
• Mst. GOHAR BEGUM v. ALTAF AHMAD 2009 CLC 369
• MUHAMMAD JABBAR v. SHAH DARAZ KHAN 2009 PCrLJ 370

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2009 →

best advocate from Makran lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes