SANAULLAH KHAN versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE-V, BANNU
In the case of the submission of the declaration of Article 42 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), OIX, R9 Demarcation Act (IX of 1908), Arts 163 and 181 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition On the day of the trial, the presiding officer of the court, on the day of the trial of the reinstatement of the reinstatement, the case was adjourned to the Read Note Reader and the adjournment date, before the case was presented, was dismissed by the plaintiff. Executed Power of Attorney in favor of The Special Counsel moved a request for restitution of the case by the special counsel to participate in the proceedings, which was accepted by the trial court and the case was restored, the appellate court reversed the trial. Retained order. The constitutional petition was charged with unlawful, extreme strings, with no jurisdiction and no legal authority, and it was alleged that the application was filed was not within the time frame of the trial and No further plea was granted for the delay. Further, it was alleged that the power of attorney executed by the plaintiff in favor of his lawyer was invalid as no specific authority was granted to the attorney to recover the case. Was. The attorney revealed that the special counsel was specifically authorized to pursue the case, with regard to the question of limitation, it is clear from the record that the presiding officer of the court at the hearing was engaged in a court meeting. And the case was adjourned to the reader. As of the date of the hearing, the date of the trial was excluded when the note reader
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
