Sections 4 and 7 of the Northwest Frontier Province Tenancy Act (XXV of 1950), Section 586 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Amendment Powers of the Board of Revenue Scope Petitioners of the Constitution, who were the landowners, rabi and kharif crops. The lawsuit was filed for production. Praying for rent until the judgment of the respondents / tenants, the trial court passed a production order along with the eviction disclosure tenants, however, as amended by the collector's costs, 71 920 were entitled, Appeal was filed before the Court of Appeal / Revision Revenue Appeal before the Court against the order of the collector duo, which appealed to the extent of cost of crops during the pendency of the suit and tenants. / Revision was accepted, upon review by the tenants, as a cost of improvement of the Member Board of Revenue, 71.9 20 was entitled to Rs. According to the counsel for the petitioner / landlord's lawyer, the appellate court on merit received a remand from the Revenue Appellate Court, directing the court to decide the case. s asserted that the Board of Revenue does not have the authority to modify the North West Frontier Province Tenancy Act, 1950, under the West Pakistan Board of Revenue Act 1957, under the Validation Section 4 of the Tenancy Act, 1950, as well as the West Frontier Province Tenancy Act, 1950, clearly proved that the Board of Revenue's superintendency, in the case of land revenue and tenancy, had the authority to oversee and oversee the work of all revenue officers and revenue courts \ r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
