Following the formal dismissal of the lawsuit for Articles 6 and 13, the lawsuit filed by the plaintiff on behalf of the bs allahabad, the lawsuit filed a review against it that the sale in relation to the summit land. The transaction was included in the mutation and its occupation. The defendant / seller was handed over and the plaintiff acknowledged the fact that the plaintiff's witness acknowledged the fact that when the suit was given to the plaintiff / seller at the time, he did not know about the illegal sale. The plaintiff was informed and had possession facts. In the capacity of the Purchaser / Buyer Plaintiff, from time to time, the Kesrawdi, who was aware of the transaction, failed to timely comply with the legal demands and was entitled to the North-West Frontier Province Pre-Impression Act of 1987. Was recorded under Section 13. The plaintiff had disclosed that at the time of filing the case, he did not mention the date, time, place and name of the information in the case nor did it prove in the evidence that the date, time, place and name of the informant were specific. It should be mentioned as well and it should be proved during the evidence when the demand was not complied with in this case. The following courts recorded concurrent results of the facts; no wrong reading and non-reading were identified by the plaintiff's lawyer so as to warrant interference with the amended jurisdiction of the High Court, dismissing the request for review. Was done, under the circumstances
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
