Section 324/148/149/337 F (v) The FIR, site plan and relevant documents of appreciation of evidence were not brought to the record of this case, but were nevertheless considered by the trial court, Who were not guaranteed under the law. There was no restriction in the joint trial in connection with the two connected cases, but when the documents in one case were to be used as evidence in the other case, they would have to be copied to the other case file and proved. , Which they lacked. The case trial court concluded that the evidence, facts, and circumstances of the attached case without showing the copies on record were not merely a valid reference, but rather a substantial consequence on which the accused's conviction was illegal. , The accused were acquitted by an unidentified verdict, but their appeal was finalized without any appeal filed against them, the trial court adjourned the adjournment till the extent of the sentence passed by the trial court. And the case was remanded. Trial court for trial de novo
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
