O XXXIX, R 2 (3) and Section 96 Penalty for violation of the status quo The provisions of the law must always be enforced with due caution and caution, especially when questioning the imprisonment and release of a citizen. I was involved Obviously, when a person is being sentenced to imprisonment in a civil affairs proceeding, it will still be extremely harassing, though unreasonable punishment under AXXX, R2 (3), CP: C. The sentence was set in the Code of Conduct, but because it had a deterrent effect, it was of a semi-criminal nature, because before finally convicting and convicting someone, the civil court had to pass any order. In addition to the infringement, it must convince itself that the infringing order was intended to challenge the jurisdiction of the court. And this was not a practice under some misunderstandings or misunderstandings - the presence of the mens rea must be discovered by the violator of the party order, and it should also be established beyond doubt. XXX, R2 (3), is a contempt of court under CPC. The proceedings, being of a criminal nature, had to be carried out as far as possible with the procedure devised to provide justice in any criminal case, declaring the failure and the order of punishment a punishable offense. Will go on and the sentence of the appellants was set aside. And were acquitted on charges of Steel Order / Temporary Order Violation \ r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
